Invitation review

A reviewer examines the proposed reason for contact, source evidence, relevant permission, scope of disclosure, practical activity, possible burden, current participant choices. They can ask for more context, narrow the offer, change the setting, decline to send it.

For a camera reply, the reviewer checks the actual custodian question and the visitor's offered observation. They confirm whether each person permits this channel, determine the information to disclose, prepare a message allowing a meaningful choice. Another invitation may need to explain a proposed disagreement or unfamiliar association.

Acceptance authorizes the stated next step. Further identity disclosure, publication, object transfer, continued contact may require another choice. Permissions, correspondence, unsuccessful offers describe the continuing procedure. The website explains these operations without sending real participant invitations.